Voormalige politici in het Grondwettelijk Hof: een noodzakelijk kwaad? Posted on July 9, 2018 /Under Analysis /With 0 Comments Marion Baetens, Michiel Vervliet(master studenten rechten, UGent), Jurgen Goossens (FWO postdoctoraal onderzoeker, UGent – universitair docent, Erasmus University Rotterdam),Pieter Cannoot (assistent, UGent) en Sien Devriendt (assistente, UGent) Bij Koninklijk Besluit van 18 maart 2018 werd

  De toekomst van de Senaat: gewikt en gewogen Posted on December 7, 2015 /Under Sixth State Reform /With 0 Comments See English version here Marie DeCock, Cédric Labens, Laura Meuleman en Elien Verniers (masterstudenten Grondige Studie Grondwettelijk Recht, UGent), Pieter Cannoot (assistent, UGent) en Juan Benjumea Moreno (assistent, UGent)

  Monthly Overview – May 2016 Posted on June 23, 2016 /Under Monthly Overview /With 0 Comments Monthly Overview – May 2016 BelConLawBlog publishes a selected reading list of (I) new scholarship on Belgian constitutional law in journals and books, (II) decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court, (III) upcoming conferences,

  future The future of Brussels after the sixth state reform Posted on December 23, 2014 /Under Sixth State Reform /With 0 Comments See Dutch version below Jana Huyghe and Pieter Steenhaut (master students Advanced Study of Constitutional Law, UGent), Jurgen Goossens (doctoral researcher, UGent) & Pieter Cannoot (academic assistant, UGent) Overview sixth state reform:

  Monthly Overview – March 2018 Posted on April 17, 2018 /Under Monthly Overview /With 0 Comments BelConLawBlog publishes a selected reading list of (I) new scholarship on Belgian constitutional law in journals and books, (II) decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court, (III) upcoming conferences, and (IV) calls for papers.

  Monthly Overview – January 2015 Posted on February 19, 2015 /Under Monthly Overview /With 0 Comments BelConLawBlog publishes a selected reading list of new scholarship regarding Belgian constitutional law in journals and books (I), decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court in which a violation of the Constitution has been