Monthly Overview – February 2017 Posted on March 19, 2017 /Under Monthly Overview /With 0 Comments BelConLawBlog publishes a selected reading list of (I) new scholarship on Belgian constitutional law in journals and books, (II) decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court, (III) upcoming conferences, and (IV) calls for papers.

  Constitutional Court upholds “New BHV” Posted on September 30, 2015 /Under Analysis /With 0 Comments Stefan Grazidei, PhD student at the Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp. Over the last years, the Belgian Constitutional Court has been confronted with an array of legal challenges to the institutional agreement on

  Rapport nieuwe transwet: vooruitgang en ruimte voor verbetering Posted on May 31, 2018 /Under Analysis /With 0 Comments Thomas Leysen en Sarah Schoentjes (masterstudenten, UGent), Pieter Cannoot (assistent, UGent), Jurgen Goossens (FWO postdoctoraal onderzoeker, UGent – universitair docent, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) en Sien Devriendt (assistente, UGent) Op 1 januari 2018 trad de nieuwe transwet van 25

  Monthly Archives: January 2015 Monthly Overview – December 2014 Posted on January 20, 2015 /Under Monthly Overview /With 0 Comments BelConLawBlog publishes a selected reading list of new scholarship regarding Belgian constitutional law in journals and books (I), decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court in which a violation of

  Onafhankelijkheid Catalonië stemt vandaag in symbolisch referendum alsnog over onafhankelijkheid! Posted on November 9, 2014 /Under Analysis /With 0 Comments Onafhankelijkheidsstreven van regio’s binnen de EU Arne Cools & Tess Heirwegh (masterstudenten Grondige Studie Grondwettelijk Recht, UGent), Jurgen Goossens (doctoraal onderzoeker, UGent) & Pieter Cannoot (assistent, UGent) Het jaar

  Monthly Overview – June 2016 Posted on August 11, 2016 /Under Monthly Overview /With 1 Comment BelConLawBlog publishes a selected reading list of (I) new scholarship on Belgian constitutional law in journals and books, (II) decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court in which a violation of the Constitution has